A Psychotherapy for the People: Toward a Progressive by Lewis Aron

By Lewis Aron

How did psychoanalysis come to outline itself as being diverse from psychotherapy? How have racism, homophobia, misogyny and anti-Semitism converged within the production of psychotherapy and psychoanalysis? Is psychoanalysis psychotherapy? Is psychoanalysis a "Jewish science"?

Inspired through the innovative and humanistic origins of psychoanalysis, Lewis Aron and Karen Starr pursue Freud's demand psychoanalysis to be a "psychotherapy for the people." They current a cultural historical past concentrating on how psychoanalysis has constantly outlined itself in terms of an "other." firstly, that different used to be hypnosis and recommendation; later it used to be psychotherapy. The authors hint a sequence of binary oppositions, every one outlined hierarchically, that have plagued the background of psychoanalysis. Tracing reverberations of racism, anti-Semitism, misogyny, and homophobia, they exhibit that psychoanalysis, linked to phallic masculinity, penetration, heterosexuality, autonomy, and tradition, was once outlined towards recommendation and psychotherapy, that have been obvious as selling dependence, female passivity, and relationality. Aron and Starr deconstruct those dichotomies, top the best way for a go back to Freud's revolutionary imaginative and prescient, during which psychoanalysis, outlined largely and flexibly, is revitalized for a brand new era.

A Psychotherapy for the People might be of curiosity to psychotherapists, psychoanalysts, scientific psychologists, psychiatrists--and their patients--and to these learning feminism, cultural experiences and Judaism.

Show description

Read or Download A Psychotherapy for the People: Toward a Progressive Psychoanalysis PDF

Best psychoanalysis books

The Language of Psychoanalysis

Identify word: unique name Vocabulaire de l. a. Psychanalyse released through Presses Universitaires de France
Author word: advent by way of Daniel Lagache
Publish 12 months observe: initially released in 1973 by means of Hogarth Press Ltd

Sigmund Freud developed his theories all through his lifetime. This entailed many revisions and adjustments which he himself by no means attempted to standardize rigidly right into a definitive conceptual approach. the necessity for a few type of a competent consultant which might spell out either the development of the evolution of Freud's pondering, in addition to identify its inherent good judgment, used to be felt for a very long time by way of either students and scholars of psychoanalysis.

Drs. Laplanche and Pontalis of the organization Psychoanalytique de France succeeded admirably in supplying a dictionary of Freud's innovations that is greater than a compilation of mere definitions. After decades of inventive and industrious learn, they have been capable of supply an real account of the evolution of every idea with pertinent assisting texts from Freud's personal writing (in the traditional variation translation), and hence have endowed us with an software for paintings and examine that is characterised through its thoroughness, exactitude and shortage of prejudice in the direction of dogma.

The Language of Psychoanalysis has already demonstrated itself as a vintage, and should lengthy remain indispensible advisor to psychoanalytic vocabulary for either scholar and research-worker in psychoanalysis.

Sigmund Freud's Discovery of Psychoanalysis: Conquistador and Thinker

Sigmund Freud's discovery of psychoanalysis explores hyperlinks among Freud's improvement of his considering and conception and his own emotional trip. It follows his early profession as a clinical scholar, researcher and neurologist, after which as a psychotherapist, to target the severe interval 1895-1900.

Narcissism: A New Theory

The writer provides clean insights into the topic of narcissism, drawing on his tremendous scientific adventure of treating humans being affected by this illness.

Anxiety: The Seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book X (Seminar of Jacques Lacan

Jacques Lacan is well known as a key determine within the historical past of psychoanalysis and some of the most influential thinkers of the twentieth Century. In anxiousness, now on hand for the 1st time in English, he explores the character of tension, suggesting that it isn't nostalgia for the thing that reasons anxiousness yet fairly its imminence.

Additional info for A Psychotherapy for the People: Toward a Progressive Psychoanalysis

Sample text

Embarking on a psychoanalytic education with its associated time and money commitments immediately upon graduation and licensing is a challenging prospect. Therefore, many people wait several years. Such an educational trajectory means we have largely an older profession. The cost of analytic training makes it difficult to diversify the class base of psychoanalytic candidates and skews the age range of analysts upward. Perhaps new licensing laws that create psychoanalysis as an independent profession will attract a wider range of applicants, even if at the cost of lowering the entry-level degree from the doctorate to the 26 Introduction master’s level.

In recent years, psychoanalysts have been calling these undecidables as they coalesce into a new structure “the third” (Ogden, 1994; Aron and Benjamin, 1999; Benjamin, 2004; Aron, 2006), while others have preferred speaking in terms of paradox (Ghent, 1992) and dialectics (Hoffman, 1998). Contemporary psychoanalysis has tried to move from an either/or to a both/and approach in an attempt to move beyond being caught in doer/done to, push/pull tugs of war. We will pay particular attention to the ways in which psychoanalysis and psychotherapy, as well as numerous key psychoanalytic concepts, became structured along binary either/or lines.

How many colleagues were hurt? How many enemies were made? We want to emphasize a key point with regard to all of these harms. None of the above changed because analysts learned from analytic experience that they should change their ways. ” Analytic case presentations did not lead to the realization that homosexuality should not be treated as pathology. They did not lead to a reevaluation of our theories of gender and sexuality or to the decision to stop blaming parents for their children’s autism, schizophrenia, or learning disabilities.

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.45 of 5 – based on 33 votes