Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in by Marco Rimanelli (eds.)

By Marco Rimanelli (eds.)

Show description

Read Online or Download Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in Single-Party-Dominant Countries PDF

Best comparative politics books

Agenda-Setting in the European Union (Palgrave studies in European Union Politics)

Why does the european take care of a few concerns yet no longer others? this is often the important query of this ebook devoted to agenda-setting procedures within the ecu. via a comparability of ecu and US coverage agendas and the research of 4 case reviews in environmental and overall healthiness coverage, this e-book deals a brand new knowing of the way coverage concerns come onto the european schedule.

National Politics and European Integration: From the Constitution to the Lisbon Treaty

This well-documented publication discusses the household politics of treaty reform within the ecu Union, from the failed referendums at the Constitutional Treaty held in France and the Netherlands in May-June 2005 to the preliminary rejection of the Treaty of Lisbon in eire in June 2008. The chapters, written by way of the various most interesting students within the box of EU/European politics, convey how ecu integration has more and more turn into a contested factor in a majority of Member States.

What Is Populism?

Donald Trump, Silvio Berlusconi, Marine Le Pen, Hugo Chávez—populists are at the upward thrust around the globe. yet what precisely is populism? should still every body who criticizes Wall highway or Washington be referred to as a populist? What accurately is the adaptation among right-wing and left-wing populism? Does populism convey executive toward the folks or is it a chance to democracy?

Extra info for Comparative Democratization and Peaceful Change in Single-Party-Dominant Countries

Sample text

However, the Moderates’ initial advantage as the indispensable guarantors of an orderly and stable transition to democracy was not sufficient to assure continuing dominance once the occupying Allies left and/or the reconstruction period was completed. Only Italy’s DC and Japan’s LDP succeeded in preserving their politico-electoral single-party dominance over nearly 50 years, while the similar initial dominance by the CDU in West Germany (1949–66), the UDC in Spain (1976–80), and the Nea Demokratia in Greece (1975–80) soon whittled away.

Conversely, the PSI split as the PSDI supported the government, while Pietro Nenni’s PSI remained alongside their PCI ally in their common revolutionary class struggle. Likewise the Leftist-dominated Italian Trade Union (CGIL) and working class were infiltrated by Catholic and moderates supported by the United States and AFL, splitting the Union into three parallel structures (CGIL, CISL, UIL) and weakening their common labor and political agendas. The DC was mightily aided by the Church’s massive anti-Communist crusade, demonstrations, and excommunication threats, while the United States openly threatened to terminate vital economic aid (Marshall Plan), while organizing a large write-in campaign by Italian-American immigrants to their relatives in Italy.

This strategy of political inclusion required formal inter-party agreements to engineer politico-constitutional and socio-economic coexistence through rigid power-sharing formulas (pactismo), or strict proportional allocation of positions and resources based on each party’s actual political strength (“proportionalism”). These anti-hegemonic solutions are 40 • Marco Rimanelli easier to achieve between two opposite blocs of similar strength to prevent either one from becoming dominant (like in Austria, or Latin America).

Download PDF sample

Rated 4.43 of 5 – based on 29 votes