By Amartya Sen, Bernard Williams
A quantity of stories of utilitarianism thought of either as a conception of non-public morality and a conception of public selection. All yet of the papers were commissioned in particular for the amount, and among them they characterize not just quite a lot of arguments for and opposed to utilitarianism but in addition a first class number of the main fascinating and influential paintings during this very energetic sector. there's additionally a considerable creation by means of the 2 editors. the amount will represent an immense stimulus and aspect of reference for a variety of philosophers, economists and social theorists.
Read or Download Utilitarianism and Beyond PDF
Similar ethics & morality books
What do we do to dwell existence correctly? chances are you'll imagine that the reply will be to imagine and mirror extra. yet this isn't Valerie Tiberius's resolution. On her view, after we fairly take account of what we're like - once we realize our mental limits - we'll see that an excessive amount of considering and reflecting is undesirable for us.
In Reason's Grief, George Harris takes W. B. Yeats's remark that we start to dwell purely once we have conceived lifestyles as tragedy as a decision for a sad ethics, anything the trendy West has but to provide. He argues that we needs to draw back from non secular understandings of tragedy and the human situation and become aware of that our species will occupy a truly short interval of background, sooner or later to vanish with no hint.
This publication examines many of the inner most questions in philosophy: what's occupied with judging a trust, motion, or feeling to be rational? What position does morality have within the form of lifestyles it makes such a lot experience to guide? How are to appreciate claims to objectivity in ethical judgments and in judgments of rationality?
So long as we care approximately ache on this planet, says political thinker Simona Forti, we're forced to inquire into the query of evil. yet is the concept that of evil nonetheless beneficial in a postmodern panorama the place absolute values were leveled and relativized by way of a historicist point of view? Given our present unwillingness to pass judgement on others, what signposts stay to lead our moral habit?
- Moral Education for Women in the Pastoral and Pythagorean Letters: Philosophers of the Household
- Moral Questions: by Rush Rhees
- Moral Virtue and Nature: A Defense of Ethical Naturalism
- Science and Technology Ethics
- A Theory of General Ethics: Human Relationships, Nature, and the Built Environment
Extra resources for Utilitarianism and Beyond
68 J. A. MIRRLEES probabilistic lotteries for alternative selves, only one of whom will actually occur, is that what is planned for some alternatives would plausibly have no effect on considered preferences regarding what happens to the other alternative selves. Such emotions as regret have to be discounted. Nevertheless, it should be possible to perform the thought-experiments required to calculate utility. While choices among alternative uncertain outcomes can define and measure utility for alternative lives taken as wholes, it would be more useful for many purposes if one could assign utility to subperiods of lives, as my earlier discussion suggested one could.
It surely might become difficult to maintain the assumptions in the face of an accumulation of certain kinds of evidence. If so, we should bear in mind the possibility that a weaker kind of independence might hold for rational preferences. In that case, it would still be possible to define utility, and show how it could be measured; but it would be best for individuals to maximise, not the sum of utilities, but some other function of utility levels. A reconstruction of utilitarianism would then be required and possible.
Therefore, the similarity postulate must be classified as a nonempirical a priori postulate. But, of course, interpersonal utility comparisons are by no means unique among empirical hypotheses in their dependence on such nonempirical postulates. In actual fact, whenever we choose among alternative empirical hypotheses, we are always dependent on some nonempirical choice criteria. This is so because the empirical facts are always consistent with infinitely many alternative hypotheses, and the only way we can choose among them is by using a priori nonempirical choice criteria, such as simplicity, parsimony, preference for the 'least arbitrary' hypothesis, etc.